The end of comfortable Christianity…

Robert George

The moment has arrived!  It is no longer easy to be a faithful Christian witness.  The operative words here are, of course, “faithful” and “witness.”  To be faithful is to be true to the truths of Christianity.  To be a witness is to speak and live those truths beyond the confines of the church—to speak them into the public arena where they are increasingly rejected.


The choice for those of us who call ourselves Christians is stark—either pay a price for being a witness or hunker down in a privatized faith that is “ashamed of the Gospel.”


This argument was made by Princeton law professor Robert George in a speech to the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C.  As a distinguished legal scholar and public intellectual, Dr. George is a formidable opponent of same sex marriage and abortion.  His cultural observations and comments are equally apropos for Protestants who share his concern about the moral direction of contemporary society.


A price is demanded and must be paid. There are costs of discipleship—costs that are burdensome and painful to bear.


Of course, one can still safely identify oneself as a “Christian,” and even be seen going to worship services at church. That is because the guardians of those norms of cultural orthodoxy that we have come to call “political correctness” do not assume that identifying as “Christian” or going to church necessarily means that one actually believes what the Church teaches on issues such as marriage and sexual morality and the sanctity of human life. …


In other words, a tame Christian, a Christian who is ashamed of the gospel—or who is willing to act publicly as if he or she were ashamed—is still socially acceptable. But a Christian who makes it clear that he or she is not ashamed must be prepared to take risks and make sacrifices.


Dr. George clarifies that “issues such as marriage and sexual morality and the sanctity of human life” are not the whole gospel.  But as vital elements of Christian morality and ethics, they are at loggerheads with “powerful cultural forces and currents today [that] demand that we deny or suppress” our public expressions of these positions.


“If,” Jesus said, “anyone wants to be my disciple, let him take up his cross and follow me.” We Christians in the West, having become comfortable, had forgotten, or ignored, that timeless gospel truth. There will be no ignoring it now.


Powerful forces and currents in our society press us to be ashamed of the gospel—ashamed of our faith’s teachings on the sanctity of human life in all stages and conditions, ashamed of our faith’s teachings on marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife. These forces insist that the Church’s teachings are out of date, retrograde, insensitive, uncompassionate, illiberal, bigoted—even hateful. These currents bring pressure on all of us—and on young Christians in particular—to yield to this insistence. They threaten us with consequences if we refuse to call what is good evil, and what is evil good. They command us to conform our thinking to their orthodoxy, or else keep silent.


We believe the truth—in its fullness—about the dignity of the human person and the nature of marriage and sexual morality as proclaimed by the Church for two thousand years.


We believe that every member of the human family, irrespective of age or size or stage of development or condition of dependency, is the bearer of inherent dignity and an equal right to life. We hold that the precious child in the womb, as a creature made in the very image and likeness of God, deserves respect and protection. So powerful people and institutions say we are misogynists who pose a threat to people’s privacy, an enemy of women’s “reproductive freedom.”


We believe that the core social function of marriage is to unite a man and woman as husband and wife to be mother and father to children born of their union. We hold that the norms that shape marriage as a truly conjugal partnership are grounded in its procreative nature—its singular aptness for the project of childrearing. We understand marriage as the uniquely comprehensive type of bond—comprehensive in that it unites spouses in a bodily way and not merely at the level of hearts and minds—that is oriented to and would naturally be fulfilled by their conceiving and rearing children together. Powerful people and institutions say we are homophobes, bigots, people who don’t believe in equality. We even represent a threat to people’s safety.


So when we are invited to distance ourselves from these teachings or go silent about them, when we are threatened with opprobrium or the loss of professional opportunities or social standing if we do not, we are being pressured to be ashamed of the gospel—which means to give up faith in the lordship of Christ and hope in the triumph of goodness, righteousness, and love in and through him.


Finally, Dr. George asks which audience will we play to in the public square—to those who warn us against being on the “wrong side of history” or to “the God of truth [who is] the Lord of history.”


Powerful forces tell us that our defeat in the causes of marriage and human life are inevitable. They warn us that we are on the “wrong side of history.” They insist that we will be judged by future generations the way we today judge those who championed racial injustice in the Jim Crow south.


But history does not have sides. It is an impersonal and contingent sequence of events, events that are determined in decisive ways by human deliberation, judgment, choice, and action. The future of marriage and of countless human lives can and will be determined by our judgments and choices—our willingness or unwillingness to bear faithful witness, our acts of courage or cowardice. Nor is history, or future generations, a judge invested with god-like powers to decide, much less dictate, who was right and who was wrong. The idea of a “judgment of history” is secularism’s vain, meaningless, hopeless, and pathetic attempt to devise a substitute for the final judgment of Almighty God. History is not God. God is God. History is not our judge. God is our judge.


One day we will give an account of all we have done and failed to do. Let no one suppose that we will make this accounting to some impersonal sequence of events possessing no more power to judge than a golden calf or a carved and painted totem pole. It is before God—the God of truth, the Lord of history—that we will stand. And as we tremble in his presence, it will be no use for any of us to claim that we did everything in our power to put ourselves on “the right side of history.”


One thing alone will matter: Was I a faithful witness to the gospel? Did I do everything in my power to place myself on the side of truth? The One whose only begotten Son tells us that he, and he alone, is “the way, the truth, and the life” will want to know from each of us whether we sought the truth with a pure and sincere heart, whether we sought to live by the truth authentically and with integrity, and whether we stood up for the truth, speaking it out loud and in public, bearing the costs of discipleship that are inevitably imposed on faithful witnesses to truth by cultures that turn away from God and his law. Or were we ashamed of the gospel?



Dr. Robert P. George is McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, and formerly a member of the President’s Council on Bioethics.  He is the author of numerous books and magazine and journal articles.  Dr. George is co-author, with Ryan Anderson and Sherif Girgis, of What Is Marriage?: Man and Woman: A Defense, one of the most able defenses of traditional marriage available.


An adapted version of Dr. George’s talk, “Ashamed of the Gospel,” is available at the website of Touchstone Magazine.



Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Technorati Facebook Email

One Response to “The end of comfortable Christianity…”

  1. Here’s some further thinking on the same theme, at BreakPoint.